|

Part 2
|
Then with the Federal District Court in Maryland’s ruling that the emoluments case against Donald Trump by the Attorneys General of the District of Columbia and Maryland can move forward, we will speak with the author of the Amicus brief which is credited with providing the definition of emoluments applying to the president as any profit, gain or advantage and that the historical purpose of the emoluments clause is to function as a broad anti-corruption provision. John Mikail, a Professor of Law and Associate Dean at Georgetown University’s School of Law joins us to discuss the efforts by Trump’s lawyers and the DOJ to dismiss the case which hinges on the legal interpretation of the emoluments clauses and whether they apply to the president. Now that the Attorneys General for the District of Columbia and Maryland have been given a ruling by Federal District Judge Peter Messitte that their lawsuit against the president can move forward, we look into Trump’s apparent violation of the Constitution as he continues to do business with foreign and domestic governments and the historical nature of a federal judge for the first time ruling on what the word in the Constitution “emolument” means.
|
 |